Cheng Binghao responds to the dispute between genuine and fake Kaixin: This is the only case in the history of Internet in China.


Cheng Binghao responds to the dispute between genuine and fake Kaixin: This is the only case in the history of Internet in China.

Sina Technologies News, November 18, morning news, November 14 Renren's sale of Renren caused a heated discussion, and November 16 evening Mars financial sponsor Wang Feng Dialogue Renren's chairman and CEO Chen Yizhou, which involved the dialogue between the true and false happy network of the year. In response, Cheng Binghao, founder and former CEO of Kaixin, said that Chen Yizhou avoided talking about Wang Feng's "bearing the name of false Kaixin" and "false Kaixin" as an unfair means of competition. This is the only case in the history of Chinese Internet. The cost of violating the law is too low. He also said that the case of "true and false Kaixin" should be dealt with properly. This is probably a rare opportunity for Kaixin.

In an interview with Chen Yizhou on the evening of November 16, Wang Feng asked him, "A contest between the true and false happy network has made you ever go to court. Two years ago, Binghao has left his own Kaixingdai. Many people feel sorry for Cheng Binghao as soon as he leaves. At the beginning, in order to launch a blocking war against him, you took the name of Fake Happy Net. After many years, do you think the blocking war was worth fighting? In fact, you really blocked the happy net in the white-collar market, but eventually failed. What I want to say is, if Cheng Binghao was not blocked by you, would Cheng Binghao Kaixin have the chance to grow into a big tree in the Internet market?

Chen Yizhou responded by saying, "which pot do you want to raise?" One fact that can be proved is that Kaixin was successfully blocked by QQ farm. QQ farm bought the original code of Happy Farm on the open platform for everyone, operated by itself, and guided most of Qzone users. You can see the Alxa curve at that time. After QQ farm was launched, Qzone grew rapidly, and everyone (then called campus) and Happy Net grew smoothly. Stealing vegetables on farms is a pioneer of China's Internet, and is also an important reason for the rise of social networks in various countries. But you see the Shanghai five minute company that invented the stealing food seems to be gone. Business competition is cruel. Of course, Cheng Binghao will hate me. If I change my mind, I will hate him too.

If there is no QQ farm, Renren will live a better life, and Kaixin will also be on the market. However, if the Tencent finally resorted to offering WeChat, the second or third must be dead. The only possibility was for everyone to merge happily and connect students with white-collar users (until now, the two groups are still very segregated), and then miraculously either create a Weixin product by themselves or buy a Weixin product earlier than Zhang Xiaolong's Weixin product and promote it desperately.

The following is the full text of the article:

Many friends sent me this link: Chen Yizhou argued fiercely about Wang Feng's ten questions: I do not want to fight hard battles, but do not want to fight hard battles that are bound to die!

Originally, I felt that I had nothing to do with it, nor did I see it.

I didn't understand why they sent it to me until a friend copied it directly and sent it to me.

I feel as if I have something to do with it.

"

Wang Feng: 5Q campus network, you don't mention that we are almost forgotten, ha ha. And a classmate. I wonder if you would like to mention Cheng Binghao, a contest between true and false happy network, so that you have to book court, two years ago, Cheng Binghao has also left his own set up happy network, once gone, many people feel sorry for Cheng Binghao. At the beginning, in order to launch a blocking war against him, you took the name of Fake Happy Net. After many years, do you think the blocking war was worth fighting? In fact, you really blocked the happy net in the white-collar market, but eventually failed. What I want to say is, if Cheng Binghao was not blocked by you, would Cheng Binghao Kaixin have the chance to grow into a big tree in the Internet market?

Chen Yizhou: which pot do you want to raise? One fact that can be proved is that Kaixin was successfully blocked by QQ farm. QQ farm bought the original code of Happy Farm on the open platform for everyone, operated by itself, and guided most of Qzone users. You can see the Alxa curve at that time. After QQ farm was launched, Qzone grew rapidly, and everyone (then called campus) and Happy Net grew smoothly. Stealing vegetables on farms is a pioneer of China's Internet, and is also an important reason for the rise of social networks in various countries. But you see the Shanghai five minute company that invented the stealing food seems to be gone. Business competition is cruel. Of course, Cheng Binghao will hate me. If I change my mind, I will hate him too.

If there is no QQ farm, Renren will live a better life, and Kaixin will also be on the market. However, if the Tencent finally resorted to offering WeChat, the second or third must be dead. The only possibility was for everyone to merge happily and connect students with white-collar users (until now, the two groups are still very segregated), and then miraculously either create a Weixin product by themselves or buy a Weixin product earlier than Zhang Xiaolong's Weixin product and promote it desperately.

"

As the party mentioned above, I have the responsibility to state some facts and my position:

One

Wang Feng said that "the controversy between the true and the false Kaixingwang made you once have a court case against the book". In this case, the court finally ruled that the operating entity of the "false Kaixingwang" - Qianxiang Group, constituted unfair competition. The court forbade Qianxiang to use the "Kaixingwang" or its similar name.

Two

"Fake Happy Net" as an unfair competition means, in the history of China's Internet, only one example, I hope that there will be no more.

Three

The case of "True and False Happy Net" has aroused widespread concern in the whole society. "Many people feel sorry for Cheng Binghao" (Wang Fengyuan), because of this "unfair competition".

In the dialogue, Mr. Chen Yizhou avoided Wang Feng's reference to "carrying the name of false happy network", but focused on the impact of "QQ farm" on Renren and Kaixin. However, Tencent did not "unfair competition" and did not violate the law.

Perhaps some people only pay attention to the results, only to win or lose, but I think that the issues of "whether the competition is fair", "whether the players abide by the rules", "whether the violation of the law should be punished" deserve at least the same attention.

Four

That year's judgment ruled that Qianxiang compensated Kaixin for 400,000 yuan. Public opinion recognized that compared with Kaixin's loss and illegal income, the amount of compensation was not worth mentioning and the cost of illegal activities was too low.

It is understandable that the law lags behind the rapid development of the Internet. I think if this case is decided today, the amount of compensation will probably be different.

However, this is also the root cause of the great negative impact on Kaixinet caused by the "debate between true and false Kaixinet".

I guess this is also the fundamental reason why Mr. Chen Yizhou made this policy.

Five

From this conversation of Mr. Chen Yizhou and his previous words and deeds, we can see that Mr. Chen is very concerned about winning.

Everyone wants to win. But is it really "win" that violates the rule of "win"?

In Mr. Jinyong's world of martial arts, the heroes of rivers and lakes can ignore the law of the king, but they still attach great importance to the rules of rivers and lakes.

Because a world without rules is a nightmare for everyone.

Six

In this conversation, Mr. Chen Yizhou called us "happy net", which is very commendable.

Because before, Mr. Chen always called us "Happy 001" and "Fake Happy Net" as "Happy Net", even after the court ruled that Qianxiang Group could not use the name of "Happy Net", Mr. Chen still called us "Happy 001".

I have to say that every time I see or hear Mr. Chen calling us by a nickname he gave us on various formal occasions, I feel very unhappy.

This time, Mr. Chen finally called us "Happy Net" for the first time (as far as I know). Although I was late for many years, I still felt comfortable.

Seven

Ten years ago, I started a company for the first time. Before that, I was a typical programmer in my life.

At that time, my understanding of the business and social environment was very simple and naive, and in this respect, Mr. Chen Yizhou was much higher than me and did not know where to go.

He taught me a lot. There is no derogatory meaning in this language.

But in the past ten years, I have repeated this matter many times in my sleep. After leaving Kaixin, I suddenly realized that the case of "true and false Kaixin" would be a rare opportunity for Kaixin to develop if I handled it properly.

When everything happens, there are countless possibilities behind it. It can't decide your future. It's how you deal with it that determines your future.

But I didn't have this kind of recognition at that time. Many opportunities were not grasped well, which disappointed investors, teams and users who cared about us. I'm very sorry to you.

Therefore, Mr. Chen Yizhou's so-called "Cheng Binghao will hate me, of course," can not be reached.

All the problems are my own problems.

Finish.


Waonews is a news media from China, with hundreds of translations, rolling updates China News, hoping to get the likes of foreign netizens